FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Aave

Insights

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Reports

Create Proposal

Aave

InsightsProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformationReports
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 3 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

[ARFC] Gauntlet - Synchronicity Price Adapter “Killswitch” Functionality for LST Emode

By 0x683a...D26C02

Summary

Given limitations in the current CSPA 2.0, Aave v3 faces insolvency risks in the scenario of severe price dislocations between LST market price and LST smart contract price. Gauntlet proposes a “killswitch” functionality for LST Emode in the face of an LST depeg. See the full forum post here.

Motivation

To further improve on CSPA 2.0, Gauntlet recommends that the Aave protocol limit LST borrowing power when abnormal dislocations occur. This can prevent bad agents from taking advantage of extreme market conditions to create insolvencies on Aave. We provide the options below as a “killswitch” functionality for LST Emode in the face of an LST depeg.

Specification

We provide 4 levers (A, B, C, D) that can be pulled in the event of a depeg. Please find more details on each lever in the forum post.

We provide the following set of options to the community.

Market / Smart Contract depeg protectionMarket / Smart Contract depeg protectionLiquidity decrease triggered protectionLiquidity decrease triggered protection
OptionLever A - dynamic, automated LT reductionLever B - freeze LST + LTV -> 0Lever C - double slope 1 of BASELever D - lower LTV to non emode LST params
1 (Gauntlet choice)xxxx
2xx
3x
4 (NAY - no killswitch)

This is a poll to gauge the community’s preference:

  • Option 1: Lever A, B, C, D
  • Option 2: Lever A, B
  • Option 3: Lever B
  • Option 4: Nay - no killswitch
  • Abstain

Following community preference, we will work on the next steps in the implementation phase and will keep the community closely informed.

Disclaimer: Gauntlet reserves the right to not move forward with any parameter changes recommended in Snapshot polls, if market conditions change meaningfully.

By approving this proposal, you agree that any services provided by Gauntlet shall be governed by the terms of service available at gauntlet.network/tos.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 12834
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x329c...543eD4
247,396

Option 3: Lever B

FranklinDAO (Prev. Penn Blockchain)
106,783

Option 1: Lever A, B, C, D

0xdC1F...f5E432
106,666

Option 3: Lever B

0x62a4...96816a
81,061

Option 3: Lever B

0xB83b...Fbcf5C
80,003

Option 3: Lever B

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Tue July 25 2023, 04:44 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Fri July 28 2023, 04:44 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Option 3: Lever B

677,885.62

86.36%

2-Option 1: Lever A, B, C, D

106,893.628

13.62%

3-Option 2: Lever A, B

75.748

0.01%
Quorum 784,948.749/320,000
DocumentationBrandingContact Us