FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Aave

Insights

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Reports

Create Proposal

Aave

InsightsProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformationReports
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 3 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

[ARFC] Chaos Labs Risk Parameter Updates - Aave V2 Ethereum - 2023.6.23

By 0x5d49...45d60d

Simple Summary

A proposal to reduce the Liquidation Threshold (LT) and Loan-To-Value (LTV) and increase Liquidation Bonus (LB) and Reserve Factors (RF) for eleven (11) frozen collateral assets on Aave V2 Ethereum.

Motivation

In line with our ongoing commitment to reduce the potential risks associated with V2 markets, we suggest a phased reduction of the frozen V2 markets, comprising low-to-medium cap assets with limited liquidity. The following proposal is the first step to reduce capital efficiency across V2 collateral assets, which will be followed up with more detailed plans for additional parameter updates for these assets.

LT Reductions

Implementing a gradual decrease in LTs effectively diminishes the borrowing power for the existing markets. This proposal offers the community two alternatives - a “moderate” and an “aggressive” approach for the preliminary LT reduction.

  • Aggressive (Chaos Recommendation) - This option suggests a LT configuration that optimizes reductions without significantly increasing the number of accounts eligible for liquidation. The proposed values are set at a margin of 8% from the closest LT figure which would trigger more substantial liquidations, as can be seen in the supporting graphs here.

  • Moderate - If the community leans towards a more tempered approach of slowly reducing the Liquidation Thresholds, we propose limiting the LT decrease to a maximum of 10%. Hence, we define the “Moderate” option as the minimum between 10% or the value suggested by the aggressive approach.

  • “Aggressive”

AssetCurrent LTRec LTValue LiquidatedAccounts Liquidated
BAL70%55%$605
BAT70%52%$6106
CVX45%40%01
DPI70%42%00
ENJ67%60%$3004
KNC70%1%$1,7907
MANA75%62%$5005
REN60%40%$1,8006
xSUSHI65%60%00
YFI65%55%$5002
ZRX65%45%$5005
  • “Moderate”
AssetCurrent LTRec LTValue LiquidatedAccounts Liquidated
BAL70%60%02
BAT70%60%$2003
CVX45%40%01
DPI70%60%00
ENJ67%60%$3004
KNC70%60%$2101
MANA75%65%$4004
REN60%50%$3004
xSUSHI65%60%00
YFI65%55%$5002
ZRX65%55%00

In the tables below, we share data to quantify the effect of the recommended reductions on protocol users:

Value liquidatedAccounts liquidated
moderate$1,97020
aggressive$4,90034

As Liquidation Threshold reductions may lead to user accounts being eligible for liquidations upon their approval, we want to clarify the full implications to the community at each step. Chaos Labs will publicly communicate the planned amendments and list of affected accounts leading to the on-chain execution.

Reduce LTV to zero

Lowering the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio to zero can potentially curb borrowing by less sophisticated users. It’s important to note that due to V2’s design, users can bypass the LTV limit to borrow up to the LT value.

RF Increase

Progressively increasing the reserve factors diminishes the interest rate for providing these assets and lowers the suppliers’ incentive to supply the assets. In this proposal, we suggest an initial hike of 10% for all inactive assets.

LB Increase

We recommend increasing the LB for all proposed assets (excluding BAL and CVX) to 10% to better incentivize liquidations and accommodate for low liquidity for the given assets.

Specification

AssetCur LTRec LT*Current LTVRec LTVCurrent RFRec RFCurrent LBRec LB
BAL70%60% / 55%65%020%30%8%8%
BAT70%60% / 52%65%020%30%7.5%10%
CVX45%40%35%020%30%8.5%8%
DPI70%60% / 42%65%020%30%7.5%10%
ENJ67%60%60%020%30%6%10%
KNC70%60% / 1%60%020%30%10%8%
MANA75%65% / 62%61.5%035%45%7.5%10%
REN60%50% /40%55%020%30%7.5%10%
xSUSHI65%60%50%035%45%8.5%10%
YFI65%55%50%020%30%7.5%10%
ZRX65%55% / 45%55%020%30%7.5%10%

*Recommended LT values will be finalized after the Snapshot between the aggressive and moderate options

Next Steps

  1. Following community feedback, submit the ARFC for a snapshot vote for final approval.
  2. If consensus is reached, submit an Aave Improvement Proposal (AIP) to implement the proposed updates.

Disclaimer

Chaos Labs has not been compensated by any third party for publishing this ARFC.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 1772
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x329c...543eD4
233,390

YAE - Aggressive

FranklinDAO (Prev. Penn Blockchain)
108,948

YAE - Moderate

0x62a4...96816a
82,848

YAE - Aggressive

0xB83b...Fbcf5C
81,413

YAE - Moderate

0x8556...EdaB0B
68,961

YAE - Moderate

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Thu June 29 2023, 11:20 amVoting Period Starts
  • Sun July 02 2023, 11:20 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-YAE - Aggressive

359,761.043

54.25%

2-YAE - Moderate

303,046.743

45.7%

3-Abstain

355.664

0.05%
Quorum 663,169.291/320,000
DocumentationBrandingContact Us