FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Aave

Insights

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Reports

Create Proposal

Aave

InsightsProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformationReports
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 2 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

[ARFC] Onboard New Risk Service Provider

By 0x329c...543eD4

Title: [ARFC] Onboard New Risk Service Provider

Author: ACI ( Aave Chan Initiative)

Date: 2024-04-12


Summary

The current ARFC is set to gather all information regarding potential new Risk Service Provider for Aave DAO and allow governance to choose at ARFC Snapshot stage, which proposal shall move forward to AIP for final consideration as New Risk Service Provider alongside Chaos Labs.

Motivation

Currently there are 3 different proposals for just one Risk Service Provider slot.

As agreed by community feedback, to optimize ressource allocation, Aave DAO will only have two Risk Service Providers.

Currently, Chaos Labs is one of the Risk Service Provider, and the other slot will be represented by one of the current 3 teams that submitted different proposals previously in the form of TEMP CHECK.

It has been also decided to allow one ranked voting ARFC snapshot to allow governance to express their preference.

Specification

There are currently 3 proposals from 3 different Service Risk Providers. All proposals have passed both TEMP CHECK and TEMP CHECK Snapshot stage.

  • LlamaRisk
    • TEMP CHECK
    • TEMP CHECK Snapshot
  • OpenBlock
    • TEMP CHECK
    • TEMP CHECK Snapshot
  • Allez Labs
    • TEMP CHECK
    • TEMP CHECK Snapshot

In order to make easier to decide at ARFC Snapshot, which proposal shall move to AIP for final consideration (and therefore, which Risk Service Provider should be onboarded into Aave DAO), a table with a summary of each proposal has been made.

Risk Service ProviderProfileTEMP CHECKProposal’s durationDesired Budget
LlamaRiskEstablished in 2021 as a service to Curve DAO and its LPs, providing risk transparency analyses of assets listed on Curve, including stablecoins, RWAs (Real World Assets), LSTs (Liquid Staking Tokens), and LRTs (Liquid Restaking Tokens). In 2023, partnered with Prisma Finance to develop a comprehensive framework for assessing LST collateral risk, to produce detailed analyses for onboarding assets onto the protocol. We have since expanded our suite of risk management solutions with agent-based simulations and DeFi strategy management.https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-llamarisk-as-aave-risk-service-provider/170536 months$250,000
OpenBlockOpenBlock is an established provider of economic modeling for leading protocols in the space, including: EigenLayer, Lido, Arbitrum, Solana, Sui, Uniswap, Scroll, Fuel, Linea, Mode, and many others; we have also received a small grant in the past to study incentives on Aave. OpenBlock Labs is based in San Francisco, CA, dedicated to fostering sustainable growth within decentralized protocols through a data-driven platform.https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-openblock-as-aave-risk-service-provider/171576 months$350,000
Allez LabsAllez Labs is a team of data and risk experts with deep experience with Aave and its community since 2019. We have been involved in nearly all risk events that have affected the protocol. We are a team of longstanding Aave risk contributors, solicits community feedback for a 6-month engagement with Aave DAO. Our goal is to deliver continuous risk management and R&D to the DAO. We aim to maintain and improve Aave’s strong risk standards and support Aave’s growth and development with a risk conscious approach.https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-allez-labs-risk-provider-proposal-to-aave-dao/171166 months400,000 GHO

As a result, the ARFC Snapshot will have the following voting options:

Option A: Onboard LlamaRisk as Risk Service Provider

Option B: Onboard OpenBlock as Risk Service Provider

Option C: Onboard Allez Labs as Risk Service Provider

Disclaimer

This proposal is made independently by the ACI.

Next Steps

  1. If the ARFC snapshot outcome is YAE, escalate to an AIP vote for final confirmation for desired option as potential New Service Provider.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 441
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x41e5...3A61cA
241,344

(1st) Onboard LlamaRisk, (2nd) ABSTAIN, (3rd) NAY, (4th) Onboard Allez Labs, (5th) Onboard OpenBlock

0x57ab...112922
137,683

(1st) ABSTAIN, (2nd) NAY, (3rd) Onboard Allez Labs, (4th) Onboard LlamaRisk, (5th) Onboard OpenBlock

0xc4a9...062935
102,770

(1st) Onboard LlamaRisk, (2nd) ABSTAIN, (3rd) NAY, (4th) Onboard Allez Labs, (5th) Onboard OpenBlock

0xaFDA...353a6E
80,000

(1st) Onboard LlamaRisk, (2nd) Onboard Allez Labs, (3rd) ABSTAIN, (4th) NAY, (5th) Onboard OpenBlock

Wintermute Governance
45,243

(1st) Onboard LlamaRisk, (2nd) ABSTAIN, (3rd) Onboard Allez Labs, (4th) Onboard OpenBlock, (5th) NAY

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Thu April 18 2024, 06:25 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Sun April 21 2024, 06:25 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Onboard LlamaRisk

588,990.462

80.81%

2-ABSTAIN

137,751.831

18.9%

3-Onboard Allez Labs

2,075.262

0.28%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us