FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Yam

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Yam

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

YIP-100 contributor compensation process upgrade

By 0x9098...0E9e78

Upgrade Contributor Compensation Process

See Forum Post here: https://forum.yam.finance/t/yip-100-upgrade-contributor-compensation-process/1588

Basic Summary

Improve and streamline the way we pay contributors to improve efficiency and accountability.


Abstract - What am I proposing?

Change the compensation model so that contributors are paid more like contractors and less like employees. Shift the requirements to get paid to the contributors by requiring a โ€œrequest for compensation on the forum.โ€ Pay in both stable-coins and YAM will be distributed monthly.


Motivation - Why am I proposing it?

See this post for the full discussion around the compensation model.

Issues with the current compensation model from the linked post:

  • The YAM vesting doesnโ€™t work as intended: The idea of the YAM streams was for vesting to occur over a 3 month period. But this implies that the YAM earned for the last month would vested over the next 3 months. Instead, the YAM to be earned over the next 3 months is streamed in real time.
  • Accountability requires additional overhead from the HR group.
  • Transparency reports are not seen as important (based on how quickly they are filled out) and require that the HR group coordinates and pesters contributors to fill them out.
  • There is limited ability for contributors to work a flexible schedule that varies from month to month because the rates are set beforehand.
  • There are limited opportunities to do work via different models (bounties, milestone based compensation, etc).
  • YAM voters rely on a small group of contributors to make sure that work is being done efficiently and that all contributors are working effectively.
  • The DAO risks becoming an โ€œemployer,โ€ which could lead to regulatory issues.
  • Doing all compensation via on-chain transactions via full governance adds overhead and complexity for paying contributors.

Moving to a new model will clarify the interactions between contributors and the DAO, allow more transparency, and pave the way for a more decentralized future for YAM.


Specifications - How am I proposing it is accomplished?

These changes will need to happen in multiple stages to realize the full benefits of the program. But each stage on its own will yield its own benefits. This proposal is for the first stage.

Goals

Before we get into the full specification, lets lay out what the goals of our contributor compensation program are.

  • The Process should be transparent for contributors and token holders.
  • Contributors should be held accountable for the work they do and not be able to โ€œgameโ€ the system
  • Contributors should be fairly rewarded for their work.
  • Payment should be incentive aligned.
  • Payments should be for work that has already been done.
  • The process should require as little overhead as possible from contributors and token holders to achieve the above goals

Stage 1

Enforce the following process for contributors who do work for that DAO:

  1. Those who wish to contribute to the DAO will post to the forum with their initial proposal. It should describe what they plan to work on, expertise, and an hourly rate (guidelines should be provided). This information can be ratified via snapshot voting, and is very similar to the current procedure where a contributor will โ€œapplyโ€ to governance.

  2. At the end of a pay period (monthly), all contributors who have done work that month and wish to get paid will have 7 days (the first week of the new month) to submit a compensation request to the forum, outlining the work that they have done in the prior month and confirming the rate and total amount. These requests are like public timesheets.

    • The requests will be reviewed before being added to the contributor payment transactions
    • The requests also serve as transparency reports and give insight into what each contributor has been doing.
    • Contributors who do not submit a compensation request by the deadline will not be paid in that monthโ€™s transaction and will have to wait until a later transaction.
  3. Upon receipt and review of the reports, contributors will be paid in YAM and Stable-coins for the work they did at their pre-determined rate. Both the Stable-coin and YAM portion of their pay will be paid directly without using a stream. The price of YAM will be determined based on the 30-TWAP determined on the last day of that month. The work to create the on-chain proposal to pay contributors should take no more than 1 week (7 days).

Prerequisites to implement Stage 1.

  • Determine hourly pay rates for existing contributors and ratify through snapshot.
  • Create a general hourly pay scale for new contributors to use as a reference for future work.
  • Create forum post template that contributors can use to submit requests for compensation.
  • Create documents to clarify this process for contributors, developers, and community.

Addendum

The above is the scope of work for this stage of the update. Future stages could include:

  • Creating a multi-sig to pay contributors from.
  • Creating an optimistic governance process for the contributor payment multi-sig to allow more oversight from token holders.
  • Re-implementation of streams in a more incentive aligned and impactful way.
Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 97
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x653d...48aDa5
275,891

YES, move forward with new model

0xce15...EFF39C
82,381

NO, keep status quo

0x3920...7A4dc3
7,798

YES, move forward with new model

0x9102...E62E36
3,998

NO, keep status quo

0xFe22...77C1F6
2,273

YES, move forward with new model

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Sun January 09 2022, 05:00 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Sun January 16 2022, 05:00 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-YES, move forward with new model

291,844.374

76.99%

2-NO, keep status quo

87,240.163

23.01%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us