FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Euler Finance

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Euler Finance

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 3 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

Upgrading to ChainLink Oracles for several Markets

By 0xa6C1...793778

Authors: SNX Ambassadors

Related Discussions: This proposal follows the RFC here

Submission Date: 21st / Nov / 2022

Simple Summary

This proposal calls for changing the price feed for several markets to Chainlink. It is submitted by Millie, a member of the Synthetix Ambassadors.

Abstract

Introduce the following ChainLink Oracles for these markets:

  • RLC
  • XCN
  • ALCX
  • BAL
  • sUSD
  • GUSD
  • CRV
  • BUSD
  • LRC
  • WBTC/ETH (this Oracle will use a custom contract to retrieve the WBTC price based on the addition of WBTC/BTC ChainLink Oracle and the existing BTC/ETH oracle)

Motivation

Upgrading the price feed of the above mentioned markets to ChainLink - from the current UniswapV3 TWAP oracles - will ensure that the security of these markets will be of the highest standard and will enable healthy lending and borrowing.

Given that there are Chainlink feeds available for those markets, it’s in the best interest of Euler Protocol to upgrade them from the current oracles. Their current oracle ratings range from reliable to somewhat reliable to unreliable in some instances, because of the poor liquidity in many of their ETH pairs on Uniswap V3. In some cases the main liquidity source for the assets isn’t even on Uniswap but rather on Curve (BUSD, sUSD, GUSD, CRV).

Introducing ChainLink oracles for LRC, RLC, XCN, ALCX, BAL, sUSD, GUSD, CRV, BUSD and WBTC will increase Euler security and allow for more efficient lending/borrowing practices for those markets.

Specification & Implementation:

Upgrade the price feed of the mentioned assets in this eIP to ChainLink using the available oracles in ChainLink’s Data Feeds.

This oracle alternative was made possible by the recently passed eIP 14 and the implementation is similar to that called for in eIP 16.

Voting:

  • Yes – Change the above markets to Chainlink oracles
  • No – the above markets should find an alternative oracle.
Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 281
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x1A18...2B8B16
385,913

YES

0x66cD...B765F9
12,923

YES

0x276E...96C3c1
8,083

YES

0x70cd...b4116D
1,861

YES

0xa6C1...793778
1,466

YES

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Wed November 23 2022, 04:00 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Tue November 29 2022, 04:00 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-YES

415,154.675

99.99%

2-NO

48.009

0.01%
Quorum 415,202.684/10,000
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us