[EP4.9][Social] Select providers for EP4.7 streams
Abstract
Following the approval of EP4.7 by the DAO, prospective service providers have submitted applications to be considered by the DAO for funding. This proposal collects successful applications for a vote by the DAO.
Specification
EP4.7 provides for a budget of $3,600,000 USDC to be provided annually to qualifying service providers. All successful applications are summarized below in random order.
The purpose of this vote is to select service providers to receive streaming funding from the DAO. Per the draft rules, selection of winning proposals uses the following process:
-
Order Proposals
- Arrange all proposals in descending order based on the number of votes received.
-
Evaluate Proposals Sequentially
- Vote Threshold Check
- If a proposal has received fewer than 1 million votes, stop the evaluation process immediately.
- Comparison with ‘None of the Above’
- If a proposal has fewer votes than the ‘None of the Above’ option, stop the evaluation process.
- Budget Check
- If a proposal’s requested budget exceeds the remaining budget, skip it and move to the next proposal.
- Selection
- If a proposal passes the above checks, add it to the set of selected proposals. Deduct its requested budget from the remaining budget.
- Vote Threshold Check
Post-Selection Procedure
- If at least one service provider is chosen, the Meta-Governance working group will post an executable vote to implement the funding streams by January 10 at the latest.
Instructions
Vote FOR on any service providers whom you believe that are capable of continuous evolution and enhancement of the ENS system and for which you believe offer a good cost benefit. Do NOT vote to any provider you do not believe to be capable of such, for which you believe the proposed projects are out of scope or for which you believe the ask is too high for the proposals. Only vote “None of the Above” if you want to express your disapproval with the whole system and would rather not have ANY of the projects be selected.
Candidates:
NameSys.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $200,000 p.a.
handle.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $100,000 p.a.
NameHash Labs
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $600,000 p.a.
Unruggable
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $400,000 p.a.
generalmagic.eth & pairwise.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $300,000 p.a.
servais.eth / web3xplorer.com
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $100,000 p.a.
AlphaWallet
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $100,000 p.a.
ENS Like Protocol
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $100,000 p.a.
Namespace
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $200,000 p.a.
Gnosis Guild
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $600,000 p.a.
GravityDAO
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $100,000 p.a.
ENS Vision Forge
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $500,000 p.a.
Blockful
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $300,000 p.a.
Web3Domains.com
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $500,000 p.a.
dAppling
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $400,000 p.a.
ESF Tools
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $200,000 p.a.
StableLab
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $300,000 p.a.
The Interceptor
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $500,000 p.a.
Tally
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $300,000 p.a.
ENS Anti-Abuse Tools
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $100,000 p.a.
Wildcard Labs
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $200,000 p.a.
eth.limo
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $500,000 p.a.
wayback-machine.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $200,000 p.a.
Referrals powered by generalmagic.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $200,000 p.a.
unicorn.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $200,000 p.a.
Ethereum Follow Protocol
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $500,000 p.a.
resolverworks.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $700,000 p.a.
1w3.eth
Summary | Full Proposal Requested Budget: $500,000 p.a.
| Voter | Cast Power | Vote & Rationale |
|---|---|---|
 0x809F...eBF68e | 237,559 | NameSys.eth, NameHash Labs, Unruggable, Blockful, Wildcard Labs, eth.limo, resolverworks.eth, 1w3.eth, unicorn.eth |
 0x9831...1b6744 | 168,743 | NameHash Labs, ENS Vision Forge, eth.limo, Ethereum Follow Protocol, resolverworks.eth, Blockful, unicorn.eth, Web3Domains.com , Namespace, Unruggable, Wildcard Labs |
 0x5BFC...418390 | 159,985 | NameHash Labs, eth.limo, Namespace, resolverworks.eth, Ethereum Follow Protocol, Blockful, unicorn.eth, ENS Anti-Abuse Tools, Unruggable |
 0xb8c2...A267d5 | 154,534 | NameSys.eth, NameHash Labs, Unruggable, Namespace, Blockful, Wildcard Labs, eth.limo, resolverworks.eth, 1w3.eth |
 0x2B88...537d12 | 123,044 | NameSys.eth, NameHash Labs, Unruggable, Namespace, Blockful, The Interceptor, Wildcard Labs, eth.limo, wayback-machine.eth |
VOTE POWER
Proposal Status
- Sun December 10 2023, 11:09 amVoting Period Starts
- Fri December 15 2023, 11:09 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results
1-eth.limo
2.131M
2-NameHash Labs
2.044M
3-resolverworks.eth
1.728M