Ethereum Name Service

During the submission period, the Meta-Gov WG received 8 submissions for EP 2.2.4. A summary of the submissions is in the table below, with links to the public proposals where they have been posted.

The meta-gov stewards intend to meet and decide on a shortlist of finalists, who will be presented to the DAO for a vote to select the final fund manager. The vote will begin no later than November 7, the end of the RFP selection period.

Hi! Bruno from Mimic here! I would like to add that Mimic’s proposal was mostly focused on onchain mechanisms for the DAO to allow its funds to be managed while keeping custody of them and how to react from external/internal conditions.
Our infra can be used for the automated fund that we propose, or by another manager that you select.

I am generally against looking for what to do with treasury funds before having a revenue and expense report on hand.

I will have to research but I am not hot on any of these and would rather prefer to see ENS build ENS/ETH and/or ENS/stable liquidity on Uniswap v2 or v3 and simply earn fee revenues over time. v2 has the benefit of automatically re-compounding fee earnings into liquidity. v3 has the benefit of focusing liquidity into price bands but fees need to be collected periodically.

I think a lot of DAOs should really think about how to automate a strategy via smart contracts and providing incentives to keepers of the investment strategy vs. handing this off to centralized managers.

Hey, just to be clear Fyde Treasury intends to be a completely decentralized treasury manager. One of the goals we want to achive is to have our community be a place where we can focus on creating these types of investment infrastructure items for the general web3 ecosystem. This way individual DAO’s and protocols can avoid having to recreate these everytime and lose focus on their core objectives.