FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
VitaDAO

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

VitaDAO

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 2 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

VDP-135 VitaDAO Project Phase Out Protocol

By 0x5c0E...9f1435

One-liner: Builder Squad proposal for phasing out VitaDAO funded academic projects and spinouts.

Builder Squad Team

Anthony Schwartz, Eleanor Davies, Eli Mohamad

Simple Summary

VitaDAO will have evaluated more than 200 projects by December 2023. Out of those, 22 were funded, of which there are 7 academic projects and spinouts. These entities are managed by the VitaDAO Builder Squad.

The project evaluation and project management processes are well established, and have been voted in through DAO governance, entrusting the Builder Squad with some of the most commercially promising ones. The purpose of this proposal is to define the protocol for projects where it has been established the DAO wishes to discontinue support and/or funding.

Problem

VitaDAO is committed to funding and building projects with the potential for commercial viability. As the DAO has matured, so have its projects. Most projects are funded in milestones, with each milestone requiring a review of progress and data by the Builder Squad. Further financing is approved following a positive review.

In the natural course of scientific research and development, some projects will present negative data, therefore triggering a negative review. These projects will need to be phased out as soon as possible to preserve VitaDAO’s treasury.

The VitaDAO Builder Squad therefore, requires a standard operating procedure (SOP) to phase out projects in an efficient way, preserving the relationships with the researchers and academic institutions involved.

As per the current Builder Squad process, the following stakeholders are involved in the management of a funded academic project or spinout:

The Project Investigator (PI) The PI is the representative of the team of researchers implementing the project, which in most of our projects is extramural.

Builder Squad This is a small team of Builder Squad members assisting the Project Lead in managing the project. It includes other Builders, the Project Lead, as well as the Squad Lead.

Project Lead (PL) The PL is the single individual within VitaDAO responsible for the project outcomes. This individual serves as the first point of contact for the researcher, and represents VitaDAO. The PL reports directly to VitaCORE.

Builder Squad Lead (SL) The Builder Squad Lead is the senior individual involved in coordinating and assisting all projects the Squad is tasked with managing.

Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) VitaDAO’s scientific board of experts in aging research, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, financing and regulation.

Solution

The following process is currently implemented:

  1. The PL and Builder Squad review the project reports and updates once a milestone and/or when an anticipated project phase completion date has occurred, as per the project proposal.
  2. Using data provided by the PI, published literature and expert reviews, the team will make an internal decision whether the PI has met its milestone(s) to support additional funding.
  3. If the PL determines the milestones have been met, the next tranche of funding will be unlocked

If the project reaches a no-go inflection point (i.e. has generated negative data, has not met its milestones), the Builder Squad proposes the following:

  1. The PL will meet with the PI to discuss ways to amend the project path, and possibly move the project forward.
  2. The PI will be asked to write a project continuation proposal, which will be shared with the Builder Squad.
  3. The Builder Squad will review the proposal and the PL will determine if the newly amended path will suffice to move the project forward.

If the project continuation proposal is insufficient, the Builder Squad proposes the following:

  1. The PL will document their position with the PI in a phase-out proposal, using the dataset, scientific arguments and explanations for each milestone that is believed not to have been met.
  2. The project phase-out proposal, dataset, and the PI’s continuation proposal will be sent to 3-5 Senior Reviewers that have expertise in the scientific and commercial aspects of the project.
  3. The PL will present the materials to VitaCore and the SAB
  4. If VitaCore and the SAB agree with the project phase-out proposal, funding will be phased out.
  5. If VitaCore and the SAB determine project milestones have been met, the PL will approve the continuation of financing for the project as per the original project proposal.
  6. If VitaCore and the SAB decide that project milestones have not been met, but the project continuation proposal is sufficient to amend the project path and achieve the initially proposed milestones, the Builder Squad will work with the PI to create a project amendment without any original budget changes, to be presented to VitaCORE and the SAB.
Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 39
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x3F04...989Bd6
692,439
0x91E8...ac122D
509,023
0x6c1e...e4CB69
205,784
0x6688...72a1ab
124,006
0x935C...5DEB2c
116,287
SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Thu January 04 2024, 03:51 amVoting Period Starts
  • Thu January 11 2024, 03:51 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-For

1.315M

65.36%

2-Against

692,439.41

34.42%

3-Abstain

4,370.614

0.22%
Quorum 2.012M/1.15M
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us