FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Stake DAO

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Stake DAO

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

SDIR#3 : Whitelist the Stake DAO multisig on Stake DAO

By 0xF4fD...f41841

Summary:

Proposal to whitelist the Stake DAO multisig on Stake DAO.

Context:

Since the launch of liquid lockers, Stake DAO’s voting power has been handed back to users, and with the current bribing environment, the DAO didn’t manage to retain its votes for its different pairs (sdt/eth, sdTKN/TKN, etc).

The DAO itself owns a lot of CRV that are either locked through the CRV locker or staked in the sdCRV/CRV pool.

Until now, the sdCRV were not staked to allow the users to have an even greater yield and voting power, but since we need to maintain the yield in our pools, we recently staked our sdCRV. The DAO now benefits from unboosted voting power which it uses to incentivise its liquidity pairs.

Rationale:

To start getting back some yield to our different pools in a more efficient manner, it is relevant to allow the DAO to lock SDT and boost its voting power.

This proposal aims to whitelist the Stake DAO Gnosis Safe multisig: (0xF930EBBd05eF8b25B1797b9b2109DDC9B0d43063) to interact with veSDT contract.

This whitelisting will have several advantages for the protocol:

  1. Allow voting on Curve and Frax for pools in the best interest of the DAO;
  2. Potential protection against hypothetical governance attacks. The multisig will not normally vote on governance proposals, but having this possibility can be a good security protection in extreme cases;
  3. Possibility to vote on Stake DAO gauge votes in the best interest of the DAO.

Technical implementation:

Whitelist Stake DAO multisig address: 0xF930EBBd05eF8b25B1797b9b2109DDC9B0d43063

on the following contract:

0x37E8386602d9EBEa2c56dd11d8E142290595f1b5

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 20
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x2f70...B0B0F5
110,920

Yes, for the whitelisting

0xD8de...f224f6
91,108

Yes, for the whitelisting

0xb7B5...CDdBEA
19,585

No, against the whitelisting

0x584B...eAC2ae
15,374

Yes, for the whitelisting

0x37B1...c85724
12,675

No, against the whitelisting

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Tue May 24 2022, 08:00 amVoting Period Starts
  • Fri May 27 2022, 08:00 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Yes, for the whitelisting

264,872.372

86.91%

2-No, against the whitelisting

32,259.322

10.58%

3-Abstain

7,642.423

2.51%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us