FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Proof Of Humanity

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Proof Of Humanity

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

[Phase 2] HIP-55: Explicit Sybil Resistance

By 0xE7f1...3979bC
HIP: 55
title: Explicit Sybil Resistance
author: @greenlucid
status: Phase 2
created: 2022-07-18
conflicts with: None
languages: EN

Simple Summary

Make the registration policy reject sybils explicitly.

Abstract

Make the Acceptance Criteria be explicit about sybils not being allowed. Allow challenging sybil submissions as Duplicate. A sybil is an actor that controls human accounts whose human does not represent themself.

Motivation

In its current state, the Policy states the registry is sybil resistant, which is a desirable trait. But the Acceptance Criteria was not explicit about this. This has resulted in some different strategies to creating sybils, like farming, or helping family members to get in while controlling their keys.

Implementation

Merge this PR to the HIP-45 compliant repo . Changes are also stated here, for completion: (but, the authoritative wording is in the PR)

  1. Define sybil as

actor that has direct control over registered human accounts that don’t represent them

and be explicit about 100% proof not needed.

  1. Add non-sybil as Acceptance Criteria.
  2. Add examples of sybils.
  3. Add sybil as Duplicate worthy challenge.

Rationale

It’s not possible to prove that someone is a sybil at its core, since that would imply proving they are holding other accounts’ private keys or whatever equivalent. So, an explanation with reasonable, extremely-high likely arguments for someone being a sybil, should be enough. The most important characteristic of the registry is sybil resistance, not inclusion.

It would also be desirable to treat a sybil submission challenge as a Duplicate, because then, whoever vouched for them gets removed as well (who, is certainly malicious, unawarely or knowingly so).

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 121
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x2A52...8c8676
70

Make no changes

0xfd1A...df4C8a
57

Pass to phase 3

0x6986...Bd1Edc
47

Make no changes

0x3c13...6CC641
23

Pass to phase 3

0x6687...558dd6
20

Pass to phase 3

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Fri September 16 2022, 09:25 amVoting Period Starts
  • Mon September 19 2022, 09:26 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Pass to phase 3

257

59.35%

2-Make no changes

176

40.65%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us