TLDR

Name our smart contracts, get paid.

Why?

ENS is contemplating running a naming incentive specifically around smart contracts. Regardless of the incentive, I believe it is in the best interest of Nouns to name our smart contracts especially if the UX/UI changes to support this. ENS is a great DAO to partner with and we should show support by leading by example.

How?

Executing this proposal will use the ENScribe contracts to register names on ENS. We will remove access to the app (the last step)

Contracts With High Impact

• 0x830BD73E4184ceF73443C15111a1DF14e495C706 (auction) proposing we name this auction.nouns.eth
• 0xf790A5f59678dd733fb3De93493A91f472ca1365 (prop and comments) proposing we name this candidates.nouns.eth
• 0x883860178F95d0C82413eDc1D6De530cB4771d55 (client rewards) proposing we name this rewards.nouns.eth
• 0x0fd206FC7A7dBcD5661157eDCb1FFDD0D02A61ff (streams) proposing we name this stream.nouns.eth
• 0x6f3E6272A167e8AcCb32072d08E0957F9c79223d (proposals) proposing we name this proposal.nouns.eth
• 0x9C8fF314C9Bc7F6e59A9d9225Fb22946427eDC03 (delegation) proposing we name this delagate.nouns.eth

Call Outs And Onchain Actions

Step 1: We give the ENScribe contract temporary permission to manage our ENS name Step 2-7: We call the ENScribe contract to register names for our contracts Step 8: We remove ENScribe’s permission to manage our ENS name

The above steps and figuring out the onchain actions could have not been possible without the help of Nouner James/jkm.eth from Lighthouse.cx. As well as Index and Wylin for comments and shoutout Tabs.wtf.

Comp

No comp. If we do get a nice airdrop, I highly suggest to all we keep it as a show of good faith to ENS DAO.