FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Krause House

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Krause House

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

Instantiate KH Governance 2.0

By 0xC8Af...e168EE

Intentions

  • Make governance state explicit, such that Jerry’s have increased transparency, comprehensibility, and ability to suggest changes.
  • Define organizational and team specific norms to increase accountability.
  • Allow Jerry’s to tweak governance more easily and granularly.
  • Allow voters to see changes / proposals in context.

Proposal

  • Create an ENS field on krausehouse.eth called “governance” which points to a URI representing the current governance state of the DAO.
  • Recognize this field as the official source of truth for Krause House Governance state procedures, and norms.
  • Seed that field with the following link as the first recognized state of DAO governance under this model: https://github.com/Krause-House/org/tree/fce91f81f34f16b8f462f91dad56064e60a56ee5

How will the state of the DAO get updated?

Moving forwards, Snapshot proposals will propose a link to an updated org chart if they propose changes. It it passes, the Multisig will update the ENS field to that URI.

Note: That URI must point to a resource that cannot be changed after the fact (ex: github commit, IPFS) or it should be rejected by the Multisig.

Reversibility

The tokenholders have the explicit power to revert the governance structure to the prior model or to an improved iteration.

Footnotes

  1. Please check out the proposed governance state here.
  2. Given that all tokens are technically eligible for voting, there is no explicit permission or norm in this governance proposal that restricts a token’s voting rights based on it’s acquisition source (earned, purchased, or airdropped). In simpler terms, all tokens are eligible for voting.
  3. For this proposal, votes will be aggregated for the “Decline” options.
Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 34
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0xf1F0...2f20B0
52,892

100% for Ratify (Yes)

0x3E96...edEd40
49,000

50% for Ratify (Yes), 5% for Decline (Needs Edits), 45% for Abstain

0xAEa9...6f0112
22,700

100% for Ratify (Yes)

0x5e44...53A27c
22,000

100% for Ratify (Yes)

0x0988...f7ddCA
19,972

100% for Ratify (Yes)

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Tue September 13 2022, 10:59 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Fri September 16 2022, 10:59 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Ratify (Yes)

203,745.785

88.62%

2-Abstain

22,070.008

9.6%

3-Decline (Needs Edits)

3,694.515

1.61%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us