FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
juicebox

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

juicebox

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 3 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

JBP-265 - Transfer 200k funds: Juicebox v1 → v2 treasury

By 0x50e7...11b4BA
Author: gulan
Date: (2022-09-25)

Synopsis

State what the proposal does in one sentence.

Transfer treasury funds from v1 treasury to v2 treasury to cover ongoing payouts from the v2 treasury.

Motivation

What problem does this solve? Why now?

The v2 treasury was initially funded by JBP-210 with $200,000 USD in eth and has continued to collect fees and contributions. The expenditures have exceeded the income from fees and contribution and a new top off is required. This proposal will transfer an additional $200,000 USD.

Additionally, with the great progress of Naunce by @jigglyjams, Juicebox’s funding cycle configurations are automatically created for v2, and thus Juicebox governance has an incentive to move as many payouts from v1 to v2 as possible. It can be argued that we should transfer more than $200,000. Let me know in the discussion.

Specification

How exactly will this be executed? Be specific and leave no ambiguity.

Transfer @$200,000 from Juicebox v1 treasury to Juicebox v2 treasury.

Rationale

Why is this specification appropriate?

If we do not do the specification, we will not be able to payout the v2 projects obligations and would be forced to “default” on the projects obligations or move payouts from v2 to v1.

The $200,000 value is arbitrary and I invited debate/feedback on this value in the discussion.

Additionally, snapshot ends on the Friday before the configuration is executed. It might make sense for the DAO to allocate this transfer from the multisig balance. Although this would cause issue’s to previous allocations. ——- I will strike this argument following discussion.

Risks

What might go wrong?

The price of eth could drop substantially in the future and the $200,000 may not be enough. Additionally, the transfer specified in this proposals likely needs to come before the v2 payout occurs in FC#32 otherwise, there may not be enough funds in the treasury to payout the obligations.

If this proposal is not met, an emergency proposal may be required to ensure obligatory funding.

Timeline

When exactly should this proposal take effect? When exactly should this proposal end?

This transfer will occur in FC#32


Discussion Thread | IPFS

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 103
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0xA9a1...4050E5
25.122M

For

0x90ed...b10ff7
22.054M

For

0x36b2...7420e2
13.228M

For

0x3067...6EAB39
9.913M

For

0x6860...4EEa3c
8.209M

For

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Tue September 27 2022, 12:00 amVoting Period Starts
  • Sat October 01 2022, 12:00 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-For

109.348M

Quorum 109.348M/80M
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us