FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
JPEG’d

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

JPEG’d

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 3 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

PIP-58 Increase base LTV, Update liquidation threshold and improve Boosts mechanics

By 0x052c...701958

Abstract

This proposal aims at modifying 2 features of JPEG’d: the base LTV and the design of JPEG Boosts.

JPEG Boosts is a great feature, enabling extra LTV, and higher credit limit for rarer NFTs. It could be made even better. The proposed updates include:

  • modifying the lock expiration mechanism;
  • defining a Max Boosted LTV per collection;
  • increasing the liquidation buffer from 1% above the Base LTV to 11% above the Base LTV (up until the Max Boosted LTV).

The current base LTV on JPEG’d is lower than the competition and would be raised to match the rest of the market (ie 35% to 60% for Cryptopunks).

The proposal aims to have the following impact:

  • Make JPEG’d more attractive for borrowing by aligning the base LTV
  • Reduce user friction when creating boosts all while maintaining the JPEG boost as a supply sink

Background

Base LTV

JPEG’d current base LTV is lower than the competition. To make JPEG’d more attractive to borrow the base LTV of selected collections should be raised,

JPEG Boosts

The introduction of JPEG boosts has been a success, with around 1.5B tokens currently locked on JPEG’d and boosting positions. Traits boosts have also been borrowed by other platforms. The current design has friction and adds complexity to the user’s decisions when borrowing and boosting.

  • They have to take on the JPEG price movements into account for the time of the lock, which creates unknown costs
  • The moment the locks disable can lead to instant liquidations (although the introduction of the JPEG alert mitigates this now)

This is not yet an ideal UX and would be greatly improved if the below changes are implemented.

Specifications

The following changes would be introduced to the LTV boost mechanics:

  • increasing the base LTV of select collections to match the competition as per the table below.
  • allow JPEG LTV boost to reach max LTV without the cig boost
  • introduce a Max Liquidation Threshold to cap LTV when the cig boost and the LTV boost are combined
  • add a buffer for liquidation of 11% beyond the Base LTV up to the Max Liquidation Threshold rather than 1% like currently
  • replace the time-lock on the boost to make it perpetual and add a processing delay of 7 days for withdrawals (i.e., the user would place a request for withdrawal which would disable the boost in 7 days and unlock the JPEG tokens)
  • Allow canceling a withdrawal request
  • Existing JPEG Boosts will be marked as having a withdrawal requested and their unlock time will be the current unlock time set when the boost was created. Users can cancel the withdrawal request anytime and transform the boost in a perpetual boost.

To complete this update this proposal suggests increasing the base LTV of the selected collections to make them in line with the competition. This would make JPEG boosts more competitive as they would unlock more capital than what’s available elsewhere.

The other parameters for enabling boosts would remain the same:

  • The amount of JPEG to lock is calculated the same as before, keeping the value in ETH of $JPEG to lock consistent, independent of the USD price of $JPEG.
  • Each collection has an independent max LTV boost and base LTV
  • Cig Boost and LTV Boost can still be combined up to the Max LTV and Max Liquidation Threshold

To ensure smooth operations, enable the team to update base LTV and max boost of the different collections.

CollectionCurrent Base LTVFuture Base LTVMax LTV BoostCig BoostBase Liquidation ThresholdMax Boosted LTVMax Liquidation Threshold
Cryptopunks35%60%20%10%71%80%81%
BAYC35%60%20%10%71%80%81%
MAYC35%50%20%10%61%70%71%
BAKC35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Meebits35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Pudgy Penguins35%50%20%10%61%70%71%
Milady35%50%20%10%61%70%71%
Doodles35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Azuki35%50%20%10%61%70%71%
Clonex35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Autogylphs35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Fidenza35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Ringers35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Chromie Squiggles35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Otherdeeds35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Etherocks35%40%20%10%51%60%61%
Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 29
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x6625...884448
1.401B

Yes, apply the suggested changes

0xE470...dAC46D
489.874M

Yes, apply the suggested changes

0x88a6...1E7FC3
414.54M

Yes, apply the suggested changes

0x9f50...2DDa55
400.024M

Yes, apply the suggested changes

0x2797...93559D
385.138M

Yes, apply the suggested changes

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Thu June 08 2023, 02:11 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Sun June 11 2023, 02:11 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Yes, apply the suggested changes

3.97B

Quorum 3.97B/2.083B
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us