GIP-40: Should "15 days cool-down period" proposal be approved?
Goldfinch aims to continue to improve the efficiency of the governance process. For this reason we are suggesting to set up a 15 days cool-down period for proposals which don’t meet the quorum from the first attempt on snapshot voting. We have witnessed how some proposals do not receive the adequate exposure on snapshot, and want to offer a chance for the community to vote an additional time. After this cool down period is over, we can put a proposal for a snapshot voting again, but we suggest only implementing this once. If the proposal doesn’t reach the quorum for the second time, the whole governance procedure should start from the very beginning.
YES - means introduce a 15 days cool-down period NO - means do nothing
| Voter | Cast Power | Vote & Rationale |
|---|---|---|
 0x2b2B...e82c32 | 298,372 | 100% for YES |
 0xF212...Bb686A | 90,511 | 100% for YES |
 0x501B...222f20 | 15,472 | 100% for YES |
 0xa2dD...251b81 | 15,191 | 100% for YES |
 0x6d8b...8AFF6A | 14,229 | 100% for YES |
VOTE POWER
Proposal Status
- Mon February 06 2023, 03:09 pmVoting Period Starts
- Thu February 09 2023, 03:09 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results
1-YES
529,487.386
2-NO
10.151