FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
GMX

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

GMX

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded a year ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

Decentralization of Fee Distribution Process

By 0xc3a9...320cDE

Summary This proposal seeks to decentralize and automate the entire fee distribution process for the GMX ecosystem. Currently, fees are manually withdrawn from contracts, followed by a script-based distribution to GLP, keepers, reward distributors, and the treasury. The new process will transition to on-chain fee calculations and distributions using smart contracts, ensuring greater transparency, efficiency, and alignment.

Motivation Currently, GMX fees are manually withdrawn from contracts, after which a script distributes them to GLP, keepers, reward distributors, and the treasury. Automating fee distribution through smart contracts will improve accuracy, security, and decentralization, ensuring that funds are allocated seamlessly and transparently.

Rationale Current Process:

. Fees are manually withdrawn from contracts.

. A script is used to distribute fees to GLP, keepers, reward distributors, and the treasury.

New Process:

. Fee calculations and distributions will be executed entirely on-chain using smart contracts.

. This ensures real-time, trustless, and verifiable fee allocations.

Formalization of Handling of Keeper Costs:

  1. A maximum of 50% of GLP fees is allocated to cover v1 keeper costs. This covers Oracle price update costs. If the 50% threshold is exceeded, the treasury funds (from the 10% of v2 fees) cover the excess for v1.

  2. For v2, keeper costs are typically paid by users, but shortfalls may occur during periods of high volatility or gas prices.

This structure ensures that keeper costs are sustainably managed while maintaining sufficient funds for other critical ecosystem functions.

As of the past week between 2025-02-17 and 2025-02-10, the composition of V1 Keeper Fees was $56,281.10 and V2 was $71,074.29 for Arbitrum. For V1 Share this represents a 0.1% share, since V2 fees are at the expense of the user, there is no percentage share.

Data:https://dune.com/queries/4753429/7891340?sidebar=query-explorer&share_v1_n26d66=70&share_v2_n26d66=10

**Conclusion ** This proposal is a step toward decentralizing and automating GMX’s fee distribution process. By automating fee distribution and migrating to on-chain smart contracts, GMX will improve transparency, efficiency, and scalability.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 338
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0xc741...397082
37,345

For

0x9965...6Fd279
21,299

For

0x4e96...570f38
20,026

For

0x6037...E8D7C8
10,227

For

0xC7fF...3A9674
9,306

For

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Wed March 05 2025, 07:44 amVoting Period Starts
  • Tue March 11 2025, 07:42 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-For

121,936.345

92.61%

2-Abstain

9,726.396

7.39%

3-Against

0.016

0%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us