FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
GMX

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

GMX

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 2 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

Implementation of MP Update

By 0x8242...d2b7a6

As a continuation of the prior votes for the updating the MP system, this is a vote on remaining implementation questions covering issues related to sequence of implementation and .

Vote One https://snapshot.org/#/gmx.eth/proposal/0xe4dff0f4dde41f906c6f93eaf6406aa2b3a39aa12e15c6a5c4ea36eed6e37227

Vote Two https://snapshot.org/#/gmx.eth/proposal/0x9258ac69d1441b3b89208c0691c5749977e3e1409fe027910a42e78d436aacd0

Discussion Threads https://gov.gmx.io/t/towards-addressing-the-question-of-mps-consolidated-suggestions/3315

https://gov.gmx.io/t/towards-addressing-the-question-of-mps-next-steps/3410

https://gov.gmx.io/t/towards-addressing-the-question-of-mps-journeys-end/3458/2

In accordance with the proposers most recent forum posts there are two open queries to ensure clarity on the implementation

For refernece

Part 1:

  • Set MP emissions rate to zero
  • Set max boost percentage to zero
  • Call compound for every GMX holder

Part 2:

  • Create a migration contract with the migrate function and grant it the appropriate permissions
  • A list of addresses can be passed into the migration function
  • For each address:
  • Sum MPs in account’s wallet balance and pending claim balance
  • Mint esGMX for the account at a ratio of 25 MPs to 1 esGMX
  • Increase the GMXVester.bonusReward amount for the account by the amount of minted esGMX. This allows the user to vest the esGMX using the existing GMX Vester.

Question One - sequence of implementation Option 1 - Do Part 1 & 2 after both ready Option 2 - Do Part 1 now, Part 2 when ready

Question Two - To vest the newly issued esGMX, do you need to hold esGMX/GMX or can you vest with only time and no esGMX/GMX holding requirement

Option 3 - Need esGMX/GMX to vest esGMX Option 4 - No esGMX/GMX to vest esGMX

Votes can be allocated to all options, the leading vote between Option 1 & 2 and the leading vote between Option 3 & 4 will be taken respectively to represent the decision for Question One and Two.

Voting options have been lightly edited from proposers langauge to comply with snapshots 32 character limit on voting options.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 2576
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x69CF...CdC231
187,840

esGMX/GMX needed to vest esGMX, Do Part 1 & 2 after both ready

0x6137...6d3033
75,872

Do Part 1 & 2 after both ready, esGMX/GMX needed to vest esGMX

0x7c9B...904f2A
72,184

esGMX/GMX needed to vest esGMX, Do Part 1 & 2 after both ready

0xDda8...58c113
67,410

Do Part 1 & 2 after both ready, esGMX/GMX needed to vest esGMX

0x4e96...570f38
61,737

Do Part 1 & 2 after both ready, No esGMX/GMX need to vest esGMX

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Sat May 25 2024, 10:40 amVoting Period Starts
  • Thu May 30 2024, 12:00 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Do Part 1 & 2 after both ready

657,647.177

44.94%

2-esGMX/GMX needed to vest esGMX

626,843.529

42.84%

3-Do Part 1 now, Part 2 when ready

103,015.107

7.04%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us