Decentral Games

This is similar to what we experienced in the DG DAO last year when one of our members was banned. The decision was later overturned and now the DG DAO uses time-outs/mutes in the Discord instead of bans. Permanently banning people does not fit well with the fundamentals of web3/blockchain, and time-outs/temporary mutes are a more effective way of moderating conversations.

I believe that this DCL DAO proposal deserves a vote to “Unban”. While I do not agree with the methods that Tudamoon used, I don’t think his methods were very diplomatic, he did call out a project that ended up having its grant revoked. Saving the DCL DAO a lot of $$… Debates for the accountability committee position are going to be starting soon and I think he should be able to participate in those upcoming discord conversations, him being someone who has actively made efforts to hold grants accountable. I believe everyone deserves a 2nd chance and I am not a big fan of censorship/banning people even when we disagree with the way that they speak. Hopefully we will see a more diplomatic approach from him going forward, because holding grants accountable in a DAO is an important task.