Decentral Games

###Background

The existing daily poker rake leaderboard incentivizes player activity by distributing rewards based on the amount of rake generated. However, a critical flaw in the current system is that players can earn significantly more in rewards than the rake they contribute. This creates an imbalance where certain players extract disproportionate value without contributing adequately to the platform’s overall profitability.

While leaderboards serve as an effective engagement tool, ensuring a sustainable ecosystem requires aligning player rewards with actual contributions. The current structure can lead to an inefficient allocation of funds and does not maximize the company’s long-term financial health.

###Proposal

Adjust the cash game rake leaderboard to ensure that no player can earn more in leaderboard rewards than the rake they generate. This would be implemented by capping each player’s potential reward at 100% of their individual rake contribution.

Remove daily rewards and give weekly rewards for cash poker: 1- $100 2- $80 3- $60 4- $40 5- $30 6- $20 7- $10 8- $10 9- $5 10- $5

###Rationale

Implementing this change will provide multiple long-term benefits to the platform, including:

Financial Sustainability – By capping leaderboard payouts at rake contribution levels, we prevent an unsustainable payout structure where some players earn more than they contribute. This ensures a more balanced allocation of promotional funds, increasing profitability over time.,

Stronger Player Engagement – Players will have an incentive to generate more rake, as their potential rewards are directly tied to their contributions. This fosters a healthier ecosystem where leaderboard rewards reflect genuine activity rather than exploitative participation.,

Prevention of Reward Farming – Some players currently game the system by playing minimally yet reaping high rewards. By aligning rewards with contribution, we eliminate the ability for players to extract outsized profits without meaningful participation.,

Enhanced Long-Term Growth – Funds saved from inefficient rewards can be reallocated to more effective marketing strategies, new player acquisition efforts, and innovative tournament structures that drive engagement beyond the top few grinders.,

Encouraging a Competitive Landscape – By ensuring that every player is rewarded fairly based on their contributions, this change fosters a healthier competition where players actively engage rather than just coasting to leaderboard profits…

###Conclusion:

This proposal brings a balanced approach to rewarding players while maintaining financial responsibility. It encourages genuine participation, prevents inefficiencies, and ultimately leads to a more robust and sustainable poker ecosystem. Future adjustments can be made based on data analysis, ensuring that rewards remain competitive without compromising profitability.

By implementing this change, we create a win-win scenario where both players and the platform benefit in the long run. The proposed adjustment will foster a more competitive, engaging, and sustainable leaderboard environment that prioritizes fairness and long-term growth.