FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
CoW DAO

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

CoW DAO

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

CIP-11: Update Rules of the Solver Competition

By 0x1AdE...Fa812f

Based on this forum discussion, the proposal is to vote on adding the following to the rules of the solver competition:

  1. Social consensus (implicit rules)
  2. Local token conservation constraints

Proposed update #1: Social consensus

The current rules do not guarantee all aspects of desirable solver behavior, in particular with respect to the fairness of solutions. There are โ€œnon-writtenโ€ behavioral solver rules following from CoW Protocolโ€™s mission of pioneering a fair DEX. While these other rules are not implemented in the backend, we propose that CowDAO enforces them by

  • transparently communicating the social consensus as to what kind of solver behavior is not allowed
  • checking settlements by solvers retrospectively
  • slashing solver bonds (via a DAO vote) in case violations to the social consensus were found

For now, we suggest to consider the following types of malicious behavior (see forum post for details):

  1. Provision of unfair solutions
  2. Inflation of the objective function
  3. Illegal use of internal buffers
  4. Failure to report correct transacted values for encoded transactions
  5. Other malicious behavior

Proposed update #2: local token conservation

Unfair shifting of user surplus from one order to another can happen in the case where two orders are trading against external liquidity on independent trading cycles. This means that an order that was necessary for generating a certain surplus might not end up โ€œreceivingโ€ it. In order to mitigate such undesirable behavior, it needs to be ensured that for every user order, no external tokens โ€œenterโ€ or โ€œexitโ€ the trading cycles that the order is part of (and consequently, no surplus can be shifted between orders on independent trading cycles). This condition is referred to โ€œtoken conservation per orderโ€ or โ€œlocal token conservationโ€, and described in much greater detail in this technical blog post.

In order to provide stronger fairness guarantees for the users, we propose to add the local token conservation constraint for all user orders to be executed to the rules of the competition and implement the corresponding check in the backend.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 515
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0xF7AC...D6EAf5
14.286M

For

0x91e2...1928ce
10M

For

0x0B8d...Ef19CF
6.92M

For

0x57C2...a2D52f
4M

For

0x9Dbc...21C199
3.571M

For

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Fri July 22 2022, 01:09 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Fri July 29 2022, 01:09 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-For

48.01M

99.98%

2-Abstain

6,224.342

0.01%

3-Against

3,882.471

0.01%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us