FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Wonderland

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Wonderland

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

Resume Steady Buybacks below backing

By 0x559B...af05b9

As an investment DAO we are always looking for new investments, if we knew for a fact a company or token was valued at say, 700M (Our treasury value), but it was offered to us for 450M (our market value)โ€ฆ it would be a great investment. That is exactly the opportunity that we have by doing buybacks again!

Last time, from what I saw we were doing large buybacks all at once, but I believe that is completely wrong. It wastes money on slippage and incentivizes selling for a quick buck. Instead, we should be steadily purchasing, in $10,000-$50,000 increments of Wmemo and BURNING it with the treasury funds. This may seem counterintuitive, however, this is the superior way to handle the redistribution question for a couple reasons.

  1. It allows the market to set a penalty to exit the treasury early, and the entire penalty is distributed to the people who remain in the pool. A quick example to illustrate that point:

10 people hold 1 wmemo each which represent 1 cookie, but the market currently values the cookies at half a cookie, and the cookie treasury holds 10 cookies. If the cookie treasury decides to buy back a cookie from one of the holders, there will be 9 holders left, but 9.5 cookies left, now everyone has access to 1.055 cookies.

  1. The slow purchase will mean if you want to capture the benefits you will have to hold longer, as opposed to large purchase where you can exit and capture that benefit immediately.

  2. It benefits the treasury and the holders in the longterm for the price to stay below backing if we do slow buybacks, take the example I gave above, if we keep running that until only a couple of people are remaining, they have an enormous share of the cookie pie all of a sudden. The frogs who remain the longest should be the ones who get to eat all the cookies at the end.

I believe we should not do buybacks once we are above 90% backing, as the reward is smaller for the treasury and it can always purchase at a lower price. The exact amounts of buybacks per day should be considered by the treasury manager, but it should not be too large, or too small, as the goal is to do a steady purchase plan, reasonably our treasury could support multiple millions of dollars in purchasing per day until we are at the target price and we can resume investments.

Some other Misc reasons to resume buybacks:

  1. It is one of the safest way to deploy treasury funds, after all, every time the treasury buys and burns itโ€™s making us all a profit at the eventual redemption price.

  2. Buybacks and trading in general creates fees for the protocol

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 268
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x57E0...daCE9E
11,850

Yes - We should do buybacks

0xf13F...6d3FBF
3,395

No - We should not do buybacks

0x467a...810848
2,140

No - We should not do buybacks

0x5Ec8...28c8C5
1,498

Yes - We should do buybacks

0x8724...1a7a64
863

No - We should not do buybacks

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Wed February 02 2022, 05:00 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Fri February 04 2022, 05:00 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Yes - We should do buybacks

15,879.913

67.05%

2-No - We should not do buybacks

7,803.078

32.95%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us