FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
BeethovenX

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

BeethovenX

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

Treasury BEETS-USDC liquidity options

By 0x5411...8dE8e4

Motivation: In the very recent snapshot vote on treasury investment, the Symphony No. X BEETS 80 / USDC 20 pool ends up the 2nd highest option. https://snapshot.org/#/beets.eth/proposal/0xf2a38141322c4141ff474c25a68e67db158e37aacc2d698bc06a03edeee35c87

However, as the pool was established in the early days of the protocol. It has certain drawbacks that make it not favorable to be used as protocol-owned-liquidity. In particular, the pool has a fixed swap fee. It is better to optimize the liquidity before treasury investment.

Accordingly, the liquidity committee proposes to revise the investment options into one of following pools.

Option 1: fBEETS - USDC 50 / 50 pool with dynamic swapping fee (initially set at 5%) Option 2: BEETS - USDC 50 / 50 pool with dynamic swapping fee (initially set at 5%) Option 3: fBEETS - USDC 80 / 20 pool with dynamic swapping fee (initially set at 2%) Option 4: a new BEETS - USDC 80 / 20 pool with dynamic swapping fee (initially set at 2%)

The design of a 50 / 50 pool with 5% swapping fee is for the purpose of volatility farming, since the treasury will not stake its liquidity in BeethovenX farms, the liquidity is better designed to benefit from volatility of BEETS price. Such pool is another unique strategy enabled by Balancer tech, one could learn more about volatility farming in https://medium.com/balancer-protocol/case-study-harvesting-volatility-with-a-50-50-balancer-pool-5a6fdb8f2e41

Using fBEETS-USDC (compared with BEETS-USDC) has the following pros and cons Pros:

  1. Using fBEETS to pair with USDC would enable treasury to hold more BEETS-FTM liquidity (underlying fBEETS);
  2. It offers direct trading liquidity for fBEETS;
  3. It might offer exciting strategy for BeethovenX to utilize the upcoming Solidswap (the plan is not finalized yet)

Cons:

  1. fBEETS will likely have less trading volume compared with BEETS, thus the fBEETS-USDC pair would earn less from trading fees for the treasury;
  2. It consists effectively less BEETS in the liquidity (since fBEETS only has 80% BEETS in it)

Also note that treasury holding fBEETS will take a portion of the protocol revenue share going to fBEETS holders (though the amount is negligible).

25% of the treasury part of protocol revenue will be used to buy back BEETS and provide liquidity according to the winning option.

Regardless of the outcome, the treasury will build up protocol-owned-liquidity for BEETS, this will benefit the protocol in the long run. It will also set an example of how flexible liquidity can be managed on BeethovenX.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 95
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0xF7A8...3A6516
1.289M

fBEETS-USDC 50/50 pool

0xCD0f...caA95F
661,984

fBEETS-USDC 50/50 pool

0xC84f...37F99b
547,684

fBEETS-USDC 50/50 pool

0xb0Fa...005402
467,273

fBEETS-USDC 50/50 pool

0x1C86...B03E64
452,606

fBEETS-USDC 50/50 pool

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Wed February 02 2022, 12:00 amVoting Period Starts
  • Fri February 04 2022, 12:00 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-fBEETS-USDC 50/50 pool

5.787M

91.65%

2-fBEETS-USDC 80/20 pool

436,521.265

6.91%

3-BEETS-USDC 80/20 pool

52,252.937

0.83%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us