FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Beanstalk Farms

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Beanstalk Farms

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

Require Some Or All Multisig Signers To Be Revealed

By 0x8eD2...8837E3

BFP-73 proposes that a multisig should take over control of the admin functionality of Beanstalk, as currently Publius maintains sole control of the admin keys.

However, the current proposal leads to all the signers of the multisig being anonymous and chosen by Publius. The community has raised concerns that there is no ability to verify the existence of these individuals, and must trust Publius both has not chosen sybil identities and can safely guard the identity of these individuals (since anonymity is the motivation for their proposal).

The team posturing that anonymous signers are of upmost importance, while having a doxxed entity (Publius) knowing all of the signers identities seems counterintuitive. The motivation behind anonymous signers is to be said to prevent entities such as governments to deploy malicious code to Beanstalk. However, this can lead to a scenario where said entity compels Publius to reveal the signersโ€™ identities without being able to inform anyone of the compromise. Now only the malicious entity knows of the identities and the community has no way to respond.

This proposal postures that some or all multisig signers should have their pseudonymous identities revealed, in order to provide transparency to the community on the legitimacy of the signers.

For example, if Silo Chad or Safisynai were to be chosen as signers, the community need not be concerned on their real identities. The community has engaged with these individuals enough to gain confidence in their real existence, and that they are not merely alternative identities of Publius/other signers.

NOTE: Voting for the signers to be revealed DOES NOT mean the signers will be doxxed! Simply their community handles can be revealed, or if a business is one of the signers, simply their business name (e.g many multisigs in DeFi have investment funds as one of their signers).

There are options for different amount of signer identities being revealed (note that Publius is already considered a doxxed signer). For example if the community chooses โ€œ50% - 1โ€ and the signers of the multisig are 7, then 2 new signers must have their identities revealed (as Publius counts as one of them, until he is removed)

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 74
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x10bf...DCC0e4
8.621M

No signers revealed (no change)

0xEf49...0838C8
3.273M

All Signers Revealed

0xa822...0b5257
2.799M

No signers revealed (no change)

0x9664...9340cf
2.474M

All Signers Revealed

0x4342...BB2844
2.175M

No signers revealed (no change)

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Sat June 04 2022, 08:06 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Tue June 07 2022, 08:06 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-No signers revealed (no change)

25.744M

64.24%

2-All Signers Revealed

11.74M

29.29%

3-50% - 1 of signers revealed

2.168M

5.41%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us