FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Bancor

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Bancor

ProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 3 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

Proposal: Migrate V2.1 Surplus and Open Withdrawals

By 0xc268...222060

Voting instructions

Vote FOR to grant the DAO mult-sig signers the authority to migrate v2.1 POL Surplus to v3 and re-enable direct withdrawal from V2.1 per the 4 phase migration strategy detailed below.

Vote AGAINST to take no action.

Summary

The purpose of this proposal is to come to a final resolution to v2.1/3 migration and surplus discussion that has been ongoing for over 110 days. This topic has been extensively discussed and the proposal is in alignment with what seems to be the community consensus for a path to resolution.

The previous discussions are linked below for your ease of reference and based on @NIX 's detailed 4 part migration analysis within. For ease of reference, the historical chats are provided below:

https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-move-v2-1-liquidity-to-v3/3872/229?u=infoparity

https://gov.bancor.network/t/migrate-pol-from-v2-1-to-v3/4081?u=infoparity

4 Phase V2.1 POL Surplus Migration and V2.1 Withdrawal Strategy

Phase 1: Cooldown Period

  • Provide a 1 week cooldown period for v2.1 LPs to make a final determination to migrate to v3 or stay in 2.1.

Phase 2: Permanently stop migrations to v3

  • Remove the ability for v2.1 to migrate to v3 permanently after the cooldown period has lapsed. This prevents gaming the system to minimize an LPโ€™s potential losses. After this phase is complete migrations from 2.1 to 3 are permanently deprecated.

Phase 3: Move v2.1 POL Surplus

  • Move the POL surplus for v2.1 pools in surplus per XRXโ€™s analysis (see above 4 part post in โ€œSummaryโ€ section).

Phase 4: Reopen v2.1 withdrawals

  • After POL surpluses are migrated, reopen the ability to withdraw from v2.1. LPs withdrawing from v2.1 will experience true impermanent loss, not the additional re-balancing losses based on XRX solution.

Conclusion

Coming to a resolution on the 2.1/3 migration debate is a critical step to alleviating the v3 deficit and honoring protocol obligations for legacy LPs in 2.1. The 4 phase strategy provides a clear end to the debate, allowing the DAO to focus all resources on further improvements to v3 and the new v4 protocol which will soon be shared. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to coming to a solution.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 23
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0xc32E...35cC22
2M

Abstain

0x9326...aC7Ed9
381,313

Abstain

0x268C...A3aa14
295,836

For

0x21dB...18AF45
233,857

Abstain

0xf6f7...5097e3
135,641

For

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Sun October 16 2022, 12:43 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Wed October 19 2022, 03:43 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Abstain

2.612M

83.17%

2-For

525,665.192

16.74%

3-Against

2,739.313

0.09%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us