FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Balancer

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Balancer

ProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

[BIP-4] Implement New Gauge Requirements

By 0x512f...C0f5F3

Motivation

As some have noticed, the CREAM/WETH gauge we recently approved has been allocated over 40% of BAL emissions. In concert with that, the swap fee on the pool has been set to 10%. This has exposed a hole in our gauge requirements that should be remedied for all past and future gauges. By setting the swap fee to 10% they are attempting to prevent trading in the pool in order to passively farm BAL rewards.

  • For each gauge, the underlying poolโ€™s owner must be set to Balancer Governance. If this is not the case, a very good reason must be presented in the gauge proposal

  • If Balancer Governance is not the owner, any proposed change to the swap fee must be communicated to Balancerโ€™s community in the #swap-fee-and-amplification channel in Balancerโ€™s discord. This must be done at least 24h in advance of the change being made and the change can only be made if the Ballers (Balancer community contributors) are in favor.

Failure to adhere to these guidelines for existing gauges where the owner is not Balancer Governance will open the possibility for the Emergency subDAO to kill the gauge at their discretion if they believe the swap fee change to be malicious (causing liquidity to be unusable).

Risk

  • The actor(s) performing these malicious actions together likely have enough voting power to vote down this proposal on snapshot. If they do that, I would petition the Emergency subDAO to kill the gauge and classify this as a governance attack. Up to the other six members if they agree with that assessment or not.

Specification

If approved, the above guidelines will immediately and retroactively go into effect. Due to the time sensitive nature, the vote will likely begin later today but discussion can and should continue while the vote is ongoing.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 66
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x6ef7...5C6148
107,261

Yes, let's do it

0x7150...8A944D
30,439

Yes, let's do it

0x9f74...0dD68e
23,905

Yes, let's do it

0x7769...00880A
20,614

Yes, let's do it

0x512f...C0f5F3
19,414

Yes, let's do it

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Thu June 09 2022, 02:00 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Sun June 12 2022, 02:00 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Yes, let's do it

260,257.83

Quorum 260,257.83/100,000
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us