FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Arbitrum

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Arbitrum

ProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 2 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

Beefy LTIPP Council Recommended Proposal

By 0xAD16...0C6144

Link to Application

https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/beefy-ltipp-application-draft/21331

Council - 3/3 Yes Votes

Feedback

404 DAO Feedback Beefy presented a clear execution strategy to help use incentives to bootstrap its new ALM products. The rest of their application was also very thorough in regards to milestones, KPIs, and available data. Their team has proven its ability to execute and they have gained significant traction on Arbitrum since STIP. Overall, we believe they have properly justified the grant request and we’ll be supporting this application.

GFX Feedback Beefy offers a strong track record, a long history with Arbitrum, scored highly in security, and presents a straightforward plan of execution. We recommend this grant be approved.

GMX Feedback Yes, we will be supporting the proposal. Beefy has a solid reputation and a proven track record of building successful protocols not only on Arbitrum but also across other EVM ecosystems. The team’s experience is commendable, instilling confidence in their ability to deliver on their proposed milestones. However, there is a concern regarding the timeline for disbursing the incentives, as the proposed timeframe seems to exceed the duration of the program. This discrepancy should be addressed to ensure proper fund allocation and utilization. The Beefy ALM product is innovative, leveraging concentrated liquidity from various DEXes on the Arbitrum ecosystem to incentivize users, which is a unique approach to distributing incentives. Nevertheless, there are some weaknesses to consider, such as the potential lack of stickiness of liquidity gained via LTIP Rewards and the competition in the concentrated liquidity space. Additionally, the selection criteria for incentivized pools and the sizable grant amount for an unproven product raise some concerns. While the project shows promise, it may face challenges in attracting significant TVL without sufficient incentives. Overall, while the proposal has strengths, it also presents valid concerns that warrant careful consideration before allocating funds.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 5129
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x0eB5...347576
20.389M

For

0xF4B0...91D8fA
18.118M

For

0x1B68...88eeaD
16.204M

For

0x11cd...3e3A8F
15.165M

For

0xF92F...1E37B4
12.645M

For

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Tue April 09 2024, 12:00 amVoting Period Starts
  • Tue April 16 2024, 12:00 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-For

149.114M

97.05%

2-Abstain

4.416M

2.87%

3-Against

111,077.83

0.07%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us