FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
๐ŸŽ‰ A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Arbitrum

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Arbitrum

ProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 2 years ago ยท Snapshot (Offchain)

Charm Finance LTIPP Council Recommended Proposal

By 0xAD16...0C6144

Link to Application

https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/charm-finance-ltipp-application-draft/21625

Council - 3/4 Yes Votes

Feedback

404 DAO Feedback Charm Finance presented a solid application that scored well across alignment, security and general merits as their strategy targets growing the WBTC/WETH pie on Arbitrum. This application benefitted from being very straightforward in their plan and purpose. While we felt their milestone orientation were weak and grant ask was relatively high to their TVL, we are supportive of this endeavor to drive this liquidity/capital to Arbitrum. The grant ask is pretty small and feel the risk is worth pushing this to the DAO.

Karel Feedback "Vote AGAINST Charm Financeโ€™s proposal.

Well-written proposal but the justification for grant size focused on a single vault that exceeds total amount of TVL on Arbitrum is insufficient. Thereโ€™s indeed a large market to be tapped into but it seems unrealistic that this will be possible for the duration of the grant."

GMX Feedback The Charm Finance proposal aims to bring some of the 600 million in Mainnet Liquidity they have for their WETH/WBTC vault over to arbitrum using 55k of ARB. Given the relatively small ask of the grant and the need for more wBTC liquidity on Arbitrum I would be in support of this proposal. This incentive programโ€™s KPIs will depend on how much they can attract new users to the lower cost L2 environment.

For a fairly small grant this has the potential to deepen wBTC liquidity on Arbitrum and make it so users no longer need to leave the ecosystem to swap larger amounts.

GFX Feedback

The request is small, the execution plan simple. This is at the upper bounds of what we consider appropriate for more experimental and speculative grants. We recommend approving this grant, as it scored well overall.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 5169
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x0eB5...347576
20.389M

Against

0xF4B0...91D8fA
18.118M

For

0x1B68...88eeaD
16.204M

For

0x11cd...3e3A8F
15.165M

For

0x8393...6F0780
9.236M

For

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Tue April 09 2024, 12:00 amVoting Period Starts
  • Tue April 16 2024, 12:00 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-For

97.942M

80.7%

2-Against

20.561M

16.94%

3-Abstain

2.86M

2.36%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us