FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
Aavegotchi

Proposals

Discussions

Members

Information

Create Proposal

Aavegotchi

ProposalsDiscussionsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 4 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

Reducing the Parcel VRF Variance

By 0x7E47...b7B9Db

Author: MoonGotchi#1234 GotchiID: 3541 Discourse Thread: https://dao.aavegotchi.com/t/reducing-the-vrf-variance-for-parcels/3069

Problem: The VRF variance for Alchemica under the ground of parcels (0.2 - 1.8 of average) seems very high to me and could lead to some people getting rekt - see the graphic posted on the Discourse Thread.

A very unlucky spacious owner could get less alchemica than a lucky reasonable owner - which is in my opinion very bad UX, especially considering that it was communicated this wouldn’t be possible. Keep in mind that the first round (quarter) will distribute more Alchemica than the rest of them, so losing big in the first round could set someone back by a lot.

Solution: I want to propose lowering the variance to AT LEAST 0.5 - 1.5 if not even 0.75 - 1.25 for the first round (Voting Choice 1). My issue with this very high variance is that people made financial decisions based on the average numbers published before the first auction, making people lose 50-80% of Alchemica value underneath the parcel is terrible UX to me.

Another option suggested by Mori would be to create a binomial distribution with the left tail cut off, so it’s possible to win big but impossible to get rekt hard (Voting Choice 2). This results in an average pull of 100, a minimum pull of 60, and a maximum pull of ~800. There’s a fairly reasonable chance of winning this top prize, with ~0.02% of parcels being able to achieve this.

Keep in mind:

  • There are 9 rounds, so getting rekt in 1 doesn’t mean you’ll always get unlucky (even though you might!)
  • There is a VRF roll for every type of Alchemica (FUD, FOMO, ALPHA, KEK), so it’s likely you’ll get good rolls in one and bad rolls in others
Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 1009
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
0x5119...aecA6C
2.194M

Binomial Distribution

0xDd56...1eAC63
755,960

Round 1 0.75 - 1.25 & 0.5 - 1.5

0xD9D5...92D905
473,231

Round 1 0.75 - 1.25 & 0.5 - 1.5

0xE2ed...40d09b
373,293

Binomial Distribution

0x6D33...D7D9ed
360,248

Binomial Distribution

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Tue March 01 2022, 06:34 amVoting Period Starts
  • Sat March 12 2022, 11:00 amEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Binomial Distribution

7.797M

69.01%

2-Round 1 0.75 - 1.25 & 0.5 - 1.5

2.832M

25.07%

3-Don't change the Variance

668,389.1

5.92%
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us