FeedProjects
Developers
Settings
🎉 A new chapter begins: Boardroom has joined Agora
Learn more
protocol logo
Explore / Projects
1inch

Proposals

Members

Information

Create Proposal

1inch

ProposalsMembersInformation
Proposal
Back to Proposals
closedEnded 2 years ago · Snapshot (Offchain)

[1IP-43] Optimizing Fusion Mode: Smart Contract-Enforced Gas Fee Limit and Lowered Unicorn Power Threshold

By 0x8247...45Bb40

Simple Summary

  • Enforce an Ethereum gas fee limit in the 1inch Fusion mode smart contracts, setting a priorityFee cap based on the block’s baseFee.

  • Implement a penalty system, in which violators are barred from filling Fusion mode orders.

  • Reduce the Unicorn Power (UP) requirement for Resolvers from 10% to 5%.

Abstract

The proposal aims to both decrease operational costs for Fusion Mode Resolvers and encourage broader participation by introducing a smart contract-enforced priority gas fee limit and a penalty system. Furthermore, by lowering the UP requirement for Resolvers, the Fusion Mode ecosystem will be more accessible.

Motivation

Currently, Resolvers face discouragingly high operational expenses, primarily due to inflated gas fees during auctions. This issue is exacerbated due to resolvers competing with each other, leading to “resolver gas wars”. The costs of these wars are ultimately borne by participants in the 1inch Network, either through resolvers making smaller profits on filling orders or Fusion Mode users getting worse rates on their trades.

In addition, new resolvers are deterred by the high UP requirement for participation. These proposed changes directly address these issues by regulating gas costs and reducing entry thresholds.

Specification

  1. Smart Contract-enforced maximum gas fee: Implement a rule on the 1inch Fusion mode smart contracts that caps priority gas fees. All attempts to circumvent this restriction, including direct payment to a block builder’s coinbase, will result in a violation. Violations of this limit should trigger the enforcement of penalties.

    • For blocks with baseFee <10.6 gwei – the priorityFee is capped at 70% of the baseFee.

    • For blocks with baseFee between 10.6 gwei and 104.1 gwei – the priorityFee is capped at 50% of the baseFee.

    • For blocks with baseFee >104.1 gwei – priorityFee is capped at 65% of the block’s baseFee.

  2. Penalty mechanism: Offending resolvers will be barred from filling Fusion mode orders.

    • First offense – official warning

    • Second offense – one (1) day block from filling orders

    • Third offense – seven (7) day block from filling orders

    • Fourth offense – thirty (30) day block from filling orders

    • Fifth offense – three-hundred sixty-five (365) day block from filling orders

  3. Decrease in UP threshold: Propose to lower the UP requirement for Resolvers from 10% to 5% via an alteration in the DAO’s governance smart contract.

Implementation:

  • If successfully passed, this proposal will be implemented on October 16th.

  • This proposal signals to the 1inch Foundation and 1inch Labs to implement this proposal:

    • 1inch Labs should deploy the changes described in this proposal

    • 1inch Foundation should change the public Fusion Mode Terms of Use for Resolvers and communicate these changes with Resolvers

    • The 1inch Foundation should help enforce the penalties described in this proposal

Rationale

Restricting the priority gas fee protects resolvers from excessive operational costs, thus maintaining long-term sustainability. The baseFee ranges described in the specification section are based on historical data and aim to allow 99.99% of transactions to get included within 15 blocks.

A penalty mechanism reinforces compliance amongst the participants while preserving fair competition.

Lowering the UP requirement expands the number of resolvers, promoting diversity and robustness in the Fusion Mode ecosystem.

Considerations

Enforcing these changes would entail updates to the Fusion mode backend and should be thoroughly tested.

Continue Reading
Connect Wallet to Add Note
0
Votes 247
VoterCast PowerVote & Rationale
StableLab
1.534M

Yes (In favor of this change)

0xe222...01b198
1.399M

Yes (In favor of this change)

0x358F...087964
744,622

Yes (In favor of this change)

0x0f28...d3842e
744,260

Yes (In favor of this change)

0xD662...2dfeb2
640,724

Yes (In favor of this change)

SHOW MORE
VOTE POWER
0
Connect Wallet
Proposal Status
  • Mon October 02 2023, 04:11 pmVoting Period Starts
  • Sat October 07 2023, 04:11 pmEnd Voting Period
Current Results

1-Yes (In favor of this change)

11.184M

99.71%

2-No (Against this change)

29,191.9

0.26%

3-Abstain

3,718.731

0.03%
Quorum 11.217M/10M
DocumentationBrandingContact Us
Home
This Project is Currently Disabled

If you would like to enable it, please checkout below.

Boardroom Subscription

Sign up for an individual subscription (access all projects on the platform)

Subscribe
Enable Project

Enable the entire project for every user

Enable Project
Contact Us